\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{2}

\def\headline#1%
  {\begin{center}\begin{huge}\begin{bf}#1\end{bf}\end{huge}\end{center}}

\newcommand{\header}[5]{%
\begin{large}
\noindent CS 661 \hfill \today
\end{large}
\headline{Review}
\begin{description} \itemsep=-4pt
\item[Title:] #1.
\item[Author(s):] #2. \\
\item[Reviewer:] #3. 
\item[Numerical Rating:] #4. 
\item[Recommendation:] #5. \\
\end{description}}


\begin{document}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  DON'T CHANGE ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\header{TITLE}
       {AUTHORS}
       {REVIEWER}
       {RATING}
       {{\em RECOMMENDATION}}

% Summary of paper
% The Problem: What are the main problems addressed in this paper? How  
% are they addressed (theory, system design, simulation)?

% Motivation: Is this an important problem? Why or why not? It's your  
% job to decide if you believe the problem is important. Obviously the  
% author is not going to say, "This is really not an important problem,  
% but we thought we'd address it anyways."

% Summary of key contributions

% New/Key Ideas and Contributions: What are the key ideas presented in  
% this paper? What concepts should you leave with? Are these new ideas  
% about a design or are they evaluation methods? What is new that this  
% paper solves and are the contributions important?
%
% Main Findings: A summary of the main results from the paper. How much  
% better was this new idea Y than the old idea X? What can you conclude  
% from the paper?

% Important issues/problems / Impression / Justification for recommendation
% (significance of contribution, open problems, quality of the science)

% Assumptions, Weaknesses, Limitations:  Rarely (never) is a paper  
% perfect. What assumptions are made by the authors? Are they valid  
% assumptions? Realistic? What are the main drawbacks of this paper? Are  
% the solutions limited in some sense? Did they not solve the problem  
% proposed? Does the solution only have a narrow scope? Can this  
% approach be improved or extended to solve some of the weaknesses?

% Relation to my Research: How does this paper relate to the research  
% you're currently doing? This research may be personal research (for  
% your thesis or dissertation) or group research for a class. Explain  
% why it is or isn't important to the research.



{\bf Detailed comments:}
% Various suggestions for improvements to the paper
% (except english, language, grammar, etc.)

{\bf Minor fixes:}
% Typos, english, citations and such


\end{document}
